I post at SearchCommander.com now, and this post was published 14 years 4 months 9 days ago. This industry changes FAST, so blindly following the advice here *may not* be a good idea! If you're at all unsure, feel free to hit me up on Twitter and ask.
We have a client that has been using OS commerce forever, and we have a good number of links established to the various sections of their e-commerce store. For various reasons, they are looking for a new e-commerce system, and appear to have settled on what I’ll call (for now) Product X.
Several weeks ago, I had a short phone call with product X, and they answered all my questions, and seemed to be able to accomodate our needs. With only a couple of small reservations, I gave it my stamp of approval for the client.
Last week however, my client and I had a phone call together, where she explained a few shortcomings -things that may have been slightly misrepresented in my phone call with the sales department.
Although Product X told me that they COULD host a WordPress blog, apparently they cannot, so they recommended they put their 250+ pages into a subdomain.
My response? But they told me they could! OK, fine, not a deal breaker, and we can just move the blog to a subdomain, and then 301 everything. There may be an initial hit to some of the rankings, but they should bounce back.
Now here’s where it gets really sticky –
This new cart provider claims to only be able to make a maximum of “about a hundred” URLs into 301 redirects. Huh?!?
Furthermore, if those URLs are not visited EACH and EVERY 30 days, then the redirect ceases to function, and turns into… what? I’m not sure – maybe a 404 error?. (This would have been a nice feature to include in my old article “How to Make a Crappy Content Management System, wouldn’t it?)
Although that seems incredibly stupid a bit odd, there are several reasons why the client still believes this to be their best choice platforms, and it looks like the decision has already been made.
Since my goal is to retain rankings through this process, my proposed “solution” to the dilemma was to start a new subdomain, then host THAT with the new cart vendor, retaining the main domain on our own host, where we can 301 anything as we see fit.
Makes sense, doesn’t it? Plus, as an added benefit, it would also solved the problem of having to move and redirect the blog , and it seems on the surface to be the best of both worlds.
This morning though, I got an email from their marketign manager (who originally hired us) and after sending her my response, I asked permission to use it in a post, and she consented.
Here’s the entire text, including my response, and I hope you’ll weigh in with your thoughts.
Scott,
I found some chatter about subdomains. CV3 said they can set up the web shopping area as a subdomain, but I worry how that will effect those
pages based on what I have read. Based on this, I am leaning towards just moving the whole site and not creating a subdomain.[name removed]
Next was pasted all of the following text, assumedly taken from a forum somewhere – with my responses added in…
Be careful of all this bad info people are giving you! It does matter….here’s how it works….Google and other Search Engines consider Subdomains entirely new websites….
[Scott says:] Yes, they do consider them “separate” domains, but there’s no harm done ther…
so any subdomain will have a PR of 0.
[Scott says:] Well yes, to begin, but so will ANY new url. Google assigns PR (Page Rank) to a page, and not to a domain, and that’s the purpose of the 301 redirect – it passes the PR.
Subdomains are useful for blogs and such.
[Scott says:] I agree entirely, but I do consider “…and such” to include shopping carts.
1. My website all ready have page rank
2. Now I want create some more section in details. Should I go for sub domain or sub folder? Which one is better?
Creating sections should be done in Folders
[Scott says:] No argument here, and typically, if given a choice, its best to grow your site in themed or silo’d folders
3. My another question is did my present page rank will follow in all my sub domain or I have to promote individually all sub domains and what is
case in case of sub folder ?
Nope….the only way to pass page rank to the subdomain is through a link.
[Scott says:] – a link AND using 301’s for all the old URL’s for all the old links to pass PR
What you thing which is easy to remember sub domain or sub folder from the point of view of visitor?
It all depends on what the site is….but most people only remember main domains…and are confused about subdomains….most people remember
sites with www. at the beginning.
[Scott says:] Tru ‘nuff – but not a big deal to me…
I’d recommend using sub folders. if you have been working on the SEO of your root domain creating back links and all that kinda thing then create a sub domain the effects on your root domain won’t carry over to your sub domain. i unfortunately found this out the hard way
Subdomains over Folders
Subdomains are inexpensive and allow you to target the exact keyword you’re looking for. If I wanted to target the keyword ‘web hosting’, I
could add a sub domain to my site making it web-hosting.monetizers.com. The search engines will see the keyword ‘web hosting’ and factor that
into the SEO Ranking equation – almost as if you owned a domain such as web-hosting.com (this is because the bots see the first part of the url
as the most important section). The negative (and a big one at that) is many SEO experts are using this to spam search engine results.
[Scott says:] Yeah, that was true back in 2007 – Spammers used subdomains a lot will but this is pretty old news and it doesn’t work anymore anyway. The engines are far smarter, and aren’t going to brand you a spammer just for using a subdomain.
It’s speculated that search engines are and will be giving this less weight to reduce the amount of spam in their results.
[Scott says:] – If by “…giving this less weight” they mean subdomains, I disagree and would say that’s not true at all.
Domain names are still important, so it would be better to purchase a domain name such as web-hosting.com (everyone seems to forget about the
-!) rather than create a subdomain.
[Scott says:] A separate domain name is another option, but the subdomain would be on THEIR server at the cart host.
Subdomains do NOT receive any benefit (such as pr) from their parent domain.
[Scott says:] I disagree with that – It’s my belief that a subdomain does get some authority from the main domain with Google, Alexa, or anyone that matters, right out of the gate. If I were building a new business, and had the option of using http://myname.cnn.com or http://myname.com I would happily opt for being a subdomain of CNN, assuming I didn’t have the potential to ever lose the subdomain ownership down the road. In your case, since you own the parent domain, you’re safe.
Also a negative is that subdomains sit on the same IP address, so if one site’s IP gets blacklisted, so do all the rest!
[Scott says:] The subdomain will sit on their server, and with a static IP and SSL certificate there will be no other domains on the IP address.
And last, a subdomain makes it easy to forget that engines see it as a separate site; this means that you may end up placing more then 4 links
between sites and end up penalized for cross linking! A very costly SEO mistake!
[Scott says:] No search engine would be stupid enough to penalize someone for linking to their own shopping car – but – if they did, the negative publicity / buzz it could generate would be awesome 😉 Imagine the links we could get!
Folders over Sub-Domains
Folders are the way to go if you want to leverage the power of your site (PR, Inbound links,etc). Cross linking is not an issue with folders as
they are with subdomains.
[Scott says:] In a typical situation, I agree
New Domain vs Subdomain
Both a new domain and a sub domain start off the same. New domains usually have a different IP address and are given high priority on some
engines (at lease for a couple of weeks). Better to stick with a new domain name.
[Scott says:] But in our case, the subdomain would be hosted at the cart host, so it would be a different IP.
In summary: Stay away from sub domains, folders if you want to leverage your ranking and a new site if you want to really target keywords.
[Scott says:] My summary would be that permanent severe ranking damage could be done to the whole site if it gets entirely moved to their hosting without 100% completion of 301 redirects for every page, and every blog post on the site. If they can make that happen, with actual 301 redirects, then I’d vote to try it. If they can’t though, then I think it’s a disaster waiting to happen.
There was then a bit more text added –
Smart Traffic SEO Tip #37 – Creating a subdomain or a folder?
Subdomain vs. Subfolder, Subdomain.site.com OR site.com/subfolder
A few key facts regarding subdomains and subfolders.
Subdomains:
* Represented in the URL by the characters after “http://” and the ones before “.site.com”
* Are viewed by Search Engines as totally unique sites independent of the parent domain.
* Site Authority (in other words, the ability for the site and its subsequent pages to rank in the search engines) is not passed down from the parent domain.Subfolders:
* Represented in the URL by the characters after “.site.com/” and before “filename.html”.
* Are viewed by Search Engines as a subdirectory within a site.
* Site Authority is passed down from the main domain.Based on the above facts, Subdomains are viewed by search engines as totally unique sites independent of the parent domain and the site
authority is not passed down from the parent domain. This means creating subdomains requires greater quality of content to support its own and in
order for them to rank, it requires a lot of promotion and link building efforts.Between the two, it is advisable to use Subfolders rather than Subdomains. Use subdomains only when the given topic has extensive
content which requires separate navigation and design. Make sure that the subdomain is of great enough quality that it will acquire links and
stand on its own.
So now, my question to the SEO community is this… What do you think?
Besides finding a different e-commerce platform, (one that can handle hosting WP and performing true 301 redirects) what would you advise?
Relevant factors:
- 1100 pages indexed
- 6500 backlinks in Yahoo
- 200 of the 1100 pages are in the blog
I believe that far less harm will come from moving just the actual products into a new subdomain than the harm that might come from moving everything – especially given the lack of 301 redirects!
Be careful! Don’t move ANYTHING if you cant 301 them! I was once advised by a SEO company to only 301 the content that had traffic in the past 2 months. This was just laziness! We dropped off every single friggin ranking we had and for 6 months now we have not been able to regain any of the old ones we had, only more terrible less prominent new ones.
We have not recovered and I do not know if we can recover our rankings for those great terms we had before. All we needed was a small push to gain more rankings, but redoing the site without a new structure + not 301ing the new content = dead site.
I knew it would happen too. I had to sit and watch it happen (bosses made me follow the SEO companies recommendations.)It was a terrible thing. I had preserved my page titles and rankings for over a year only to have the company come in and destroy it.
Do NOT mess with the integrity of your pages! 301 everything!
You can 301 in .htaccess you don’t need an app to do it
Easy method is to download site structure from sitemap and then use notepad++ or other text editing software to manually create the 301’s and insert them into .haccess. These are permanent and the most efficient way to do it in my opinion.
That’s my feeling exactly –
It’s just asking for trouble…
Scott you’ve got too many details in the site to give a general answer to your question. It depends… really. On how the product pages are designed, how the IA works, how you add content to the cart (category pages, product pages), howpagination is set up, etc.
In general I think it’s a bad idea to host on someone else’s platform, period. So if you have to, I’d choose a subdomain to limit it to it’s own “domain”. You can expect problems some day, and don’t want to be troubleshooting someone else’s platform issues on the same domain as your own content.
That said, the cart is the likely candidate for a subdomain, since that is what they provide (but again, I don’t really know what they provide, content wise). That leaves you in control of 301s of existing URLs, as you noted.
I almost always prefer a cart be a cart and a site be an SEO optimized site, and I like the cart to be on secure-dot so I can manage SSL effectively and change carts when necessary (every few years?).
Thanks John, and I agree whole heartedly. Seems to me that using a subdomain would limit the potential for damage!
Scott,
I think that your assessment is correct. Losing the 301’s (only 100? how weired), would completely outweigh any negative impact a sub domain would have. I also believe that some domain authority does seep over into a sub domain, especially if that domain has not built many sub domains and there is a legitimate use for it.
Thanks for the input, and I do hope they go the subdomain route…
Hi Scott, I would agree with you too.
And I’m thinking here that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. So I ask you for the benefit of others who might be wondering where to install their blogs or ecommerce apps, what could have prevented this? Maybe it’s best to always install blogs in subfolders from the get-go.
Thoughts on that?
I always like to see blogs in subdirectories, but I really don’t believe one is “better” than the other…
Thanks, I agree with you if domain is not use than we use sub domain with limited loss.
I really enjoyed reading this discussion. I’ve been wrestling with many of these same questions and thoughts for some time and have tried both ways as well. I agree with the points about when to use or not use a sub-domain. However, I’ve got one last issue that I didn’t really see here but it might be a good place to introduce it.
I’ve got a site that I wanted to add a blog into. I really wanted it to be in a sub-folder as I was trying to add more content to the root domain site and the blog was my best option. The problem is that I’m being told that my only option is to use a sub-domain because system requirements (internal issue not related to any blog system or hosting platform).
My question is does anyone know or think it would be better to host this sub-domain on a different ip or the same ip as the root domain. The content will be related and there will be some linking between the two sites. Will I get more benefit from having it on a different ip than the root, will it not matter at all, or could it potentially come up as red flag? I’ve got the option of either using the same ip or a different ip for the sub-domain blog and I’ve been presented with this issue yet.
Thanks for any insight.
Yes, there IS a slight SEO benefit to having the subdomain be on a different C class IP address. Google sees a subdomain as a different domain anyway, and having the IP be different is better. Is it worth a ton of effort? Probably not, in my opinion, but if you’re setting it up new anyway, then you may as well.